Flash News

Ditari i Maxhorancës

Erion Veliaj reacts from the cell: When Ajola requested relief for her son, Ols Dado said he has two grandmothers

Erion Veliaj reacts from the cell: When Ajola requested relief for her son, Ols

The Mayor of Tirana, Erion Veliaj, has reacted again from the detention cell where he has been in Durrës for days.

In a post on social media, Veliaj has once again leveled accusations against prosecutor Olsi Dado.

According to him, when his wife, Ajola Xoxa, requested the security measure to be reduced from house arrest to mandatory reporting because there was no one to take care of their 6-year-old son, the prosecutor's reasoning was that the child had 2 grandmothers.

Veliaj: Good morning, endless friends and well-wishers, who have given me so much love and courage this week!
Do you want to have some fun with Ols Dado's violin at the hostage-taking session, at my namesake's slaughterhouse?
When Ajola requested a reduction in the preliminary measure from house arrest to mandatory appearance, due to the need for at least one of the parents to take care of our 6-year-old son, the prosecutors' reasoning was that our son has two grandmothers! So, by court decision, the child is assigned orphan status and the responsibility to raise him passes to the grandmothers! They can replace the role of parents to take him to and from school, or to accompany him to extracurricular activities, said the failed violinist. Even the grandmothers could stand in line to buy food according to their wishes, despite the fact that they have no idea whether the grandmothers are healthy, whether they drive or not, to become maids for the child declared an "orphan" and without access to a bank account by order of Spak, and so on.
Beyond this, let's say that the desolate grandmothers would carry out Spak's order and would also learn to drive, for the prosecutors, the relationship between the grandmother and the grandson is almost the same as the relationship between the mother and the son, to the point that the grandmother is the head of the house even when she does not live with her daughter, the mother of the son. Normal so far the point of view about the grandmother, but how is it possible then that the same brain that reasoned like this, also reasons that the finding of the grandson's toys in the grandmother's house on the beach, which the deceased grandfather bought when the grandson was not born and the daughter was not yet married, constituted blatant proof that that house is in fact a hidden asset of ours!
So, the same prosecutors, who are at the same time parents themselves (I don't know if their children have grandmothers or not, but they certainly should), think that grandmothers are people of the house and can take on the role of mother to the grandson without any reasonable doubt, but it can never happen in grandmothers' houses that toys of a 6-year-old grandson are found. Even more so, on the beach, where I don't believe that my son is the only kid who can't wait to go to grandma's house to meet his toys.
And I have a question: Even if it is our house, which only the brain of a lunatic like the violinist I fell into could know why I would have to hide it in my declaration if I had it, would the photos of my son's toys or the fact that my wife invites her friends to her mother's beach house for her birthday be enough evidence?
Surely yes, but not in a democracy and never, ever in Europe.
A big hug to all grandparents! Fill your grandchildren with love, because children raised with warmth do not become complexed failures like the tired construction notary who fell into my lot! Heads up!

Latest news