Flash News

Kosovo President Vjosa Osmani receives death threat

Ditari i Opozitës

PD: Rama and his family have benefited from 22.4 ha of land in Vuno!

Politiko 2024-08-02 11:44:32

PD: Rama and his family have benefited from 22.4 ha of land in Vuno!

The Democratic Party has denounced that Prime Minister Edi Rama together with his brother, as heirs of the Koleka tribe, have benefited from an area of ​​22.4 hectares of property in Vuno.

In a statement to the media, the Secretary for Legal Affairs Ivi Kaso says that the uninvested value is estimated at no less than 30 million euros and the invested amount up to 150 million euros.

According to Kosos, ATP has refused to recognize this property and its physical compensation because it found deficiencies in the documentation. The case went to the Court, where the descendants of the Koleka family won.

"Artan Lame and Jogo Goro appeared in front of the residents and announced the completion of the legalization process. A good part of the Koleka tribe, among them Aneta Koleka, the mother of the prime minister, was on the list of beneficiaries with ownership certificates.

It is about not a few meters, but about 22.4 hectares in which the Rama brothers, in the capacity of heirs, receive a part of the property, which without investing is estimated to be no less than 30 million euros, and with investments, they reach a value of 150 million euros.

From the documents we have provided, it appears that in 2017 Rama and other heirs of the Koleka tribe applied to the ATP. In an internal administrative process ATP has refused to recognize this property and its physical compensation because it found deficiencies in the documentation.

In the first place, there was no expropriation decision and, on the other hand, the lack of exact positioning of this property since there was no legal and cartographic document.

Under these conditions, the heirs of the Koleka family turned to the Vlorë court, which changed the decision of the ATP, recognizing the property to the petitioners. In this judicial process, all the state institutions that were part of this process, did not dare to participate in the trial.

 They have never appeared in defense of their decision-making. The only institution that formally participated was the State Bar, which formally defended the ATP's decision," said Kaso.

Latest news