Flash News

Ditari i Opozitës

Tabaku critical of Shalsi: You have a double standard towards independent institutions

Tabaku critical of Shalsi: You have a double standard towards independent

The deputy of the Democratic party, Jorida Tabaku, has had a fierce debate with the chairman of the Finance and Economy Committee, Shalsi, regarding the report of the KLSH. Tabaku said that the approach of the socialist Shalsi towards independent institutions reflects the approach of the majority towards these institutions "When the majority said that we want a different relationship with the independent institutions, I was thinking something else" said the democrat while saying "Yes, a special report that I like a certain institution and let's do the resolution together and I don't like a certain institution and let's do a financial audit of this institution? "

Tabaku recalled that the attack on independent institutions is not accidental, especially on those that the government does not have on its side. she recalled that it was the KLSH reports that raised the red alarm even more about the issue of incinerators. Meanwhile, he reminded the majority that the Xhafaj Commission's attempt to subordinate independent institutions is not a function of integration and the constitution.

"If the majority, if you as the chairman have objections, take the report and do a peer review. We open a process that sees and analyzes the data. We all have uncertainties and questions towards HLSH, but I have never received reports to take to independent auditors to see the work of auditors who are in conflict of interest." said Tabaku in her speech

"Their role is clear and they are not dependent on us or mine, and even less of the government. We must not cross this red line. Who has sat down and read KLSH their reports, the information they got by reading those reports as happened with the investigation commission of incinerators where my respect for every state employee who works for these reports has increased. We must protect independent institutions. Tabaku concluded her speech

The full speech of MP Jorida Tabaku

I had a concern about the procedure and also the debate I found here when I came. I had concerns about the reporting of independent institutions. I was concerned about the resolutions that are being worked on for independent institutions that should be independent, that should be so, that is, independent. I am very concerned that the HCSA report has gone to private auditors who have brought questions and are in conflict of interest with the work that HCSA performs. This is a constitutional institution and the parliament has the right to control and see the work of this constitutional institution. The Finance and Economy Commission is the only institution that must have an accounting request to the KLSH. The fact that this commission leads independent auditors to examine the work of the SSC when the assembly does this, seems unacceptable to me and I said it three weeks ago and I am repeating it. This action has affected the role of the Commission and the role of the Assembly. If the majority, if you as the chairman have objections, get the report and do a peer review. We open a process that sees and analyzes the data. We all have uncertainties and questions towards HLSH, but I have never received reports to take to independent auditors to see the work of auditors who are in conflict of interest.

When the majority said that we want a different relationship with independent institutions, I was thinking something else. What about a special report that I like a certain institution and let's make the resolution together and I don't like a certain institution and let's do a financial audit of this institution? I have a million remarks about KLSH and questions about the procedures and analysis of concession contracts, but we will do it in this committee. But such a thing cannot happen outside of this commission, since these independent institutions cannot be attacked since they are being called to report but also to be in working groups in the commissions that the government has set up. This should never happen because they have a constitutional role that they have defined in the laws and we cannot call them as if they are our subordinates. Their role is clear and they are not our dependency nor mine, and even less of the government. We must not cross this red line. Who has sat down and read KLSH their reports, the information they got by reading those reports as happened with the incinerators investigation commission where my respect for every state employee who works for these reports has increased. We must protect independent institutions.

Moving on to the second concern. So the subcommittee. We have a strategy and a report presented by our partners who support the assembly. The report describes very well the role of the assembly in lawmaking and how the assembly fights corruption. As part of that report and that document here from a year ago, the subcommittee on public finances was established. and this should be led by the opposition, and the Democratic Party has nothing to do with it, but the opposition should lead it. He was a colleague who has experience and schemes, why do we politicize him. But you want every space for the opposition to be usurped by the majority. While the majority has space to discuss and make its own decisions. the subcommittee since a year ago in the strategy is not political, but is bipartisan and led by the opposition. I made sure that I included this in the progress report and it is an obligation to be done by July and it was postponed to the end of the year at your request at the conference of leaders in January. I cannot understand why we should debate such an issue where the subcommittees are headed by the opposition.

Latest news