Flash News

Ditari i Opozitës

"The files against Berisha and Beleri were fabricated"/ Gjokutaj: Judge Gjoka was dismissed, but hid from the Supreme Court of Kosovo

"The files against Berisha and Beleri were fabricated"/ Gjokutaj:

Lawyer Genci Gjokutaj spoke this evening about the justice system in the country, while raising accusations that the latter is captured by the government.

Invited to Syri TV, Gjokutaj focused on the "Berisha" case, where he said that judge Irena Gjoka, who approved the arrest measure without going through the Parliament and rejected every defense request, is already under criminal proceedings for falsifying forms, but this happened only after she "finished working with the opposition."

Genci Gjokutaj: Look what's happening. With this issue, we have documented not only violations, but we have done an autopsy of the justice reform. What happened? This started, you know, that led directly to arrest without taking him to the Assembly, the measure of Mr. Berisha. And this has accepted 100% of the prosecutor's requests and has rejected 100% of our requests in the preliminary investigation. And we have requested the exception and we have denounced this that after they finished working with Berisha, after they finished working with Fredi Beleri, after they finished working with everyone, today they have announced that they have initiated criminal proceedings against Irena Gjoka for falsifying forms.

But to start forging seals and forms, you have to validate the conviction, because that conviction has made you a forger in Albania. We have received them with an apostille, and SPAK itself works with apostilles. And they need to urgently make the letter of intent now. Take it in any form they want.

What happened? You saw the letter that I made public, which on the 20th conceived and issued the order for the decision that would be given on the 21st.

Arbej Kraja writes the document on the 20th and sends it to Met Rrumbullaku for execution, while the decision was given the next day and within the body of the document is the date when the document was written and the date of the decision which is one day later. This is proof of the closeness. But there is no proof... it is a small detail that tells all.

We take them to the Supreme Court of Justice in December 2023 and tell them: It's in the Supreme Court of Justice database... It says, by decision of the president of the Supreme Court of Justice, Irena Gjoka was dismissed for incapacity for work.

On the 21st, the Assembly makes the request. However, when it came to the Assembly, the same signatory, the same Supreme Court says that we do not have the data in the database.

Why? Because they understood that this would be discussed in Parliament and parliamentary procedure would begin. You understand... The same person signs, gives a reference once, and later says there is no database.

Is the Supreme Judicial Council captured or not captured?  

Latest news