"Comrade Edi, don't give Ismail Qemali's flag to Taulant Balla, plant it in the heart of the EU"

By Arben Malaj

A public prayer of the only leader chosen by God. Please, comrade Edi, do not give the flag of Ismail Qemali, Taulant Balla to plant in the heart of the EU. At least make four preliminary verifications:

1. I check Taulant's backpack, since he doesn't eat two or three pears. Taulant steals another bag for "international friends".

 2. I check Taulant's suitcases, because historically he is not afraid to go through criminal customs that SPAK also searches for.

3. Check Taulant's pockets, because he is addicted to gambling and can steal fish from the "Garden of Eden" and sell them to pay off debts, even pawning them in EU casinos. Verify whether he stole fish or not with the Saudi cameras of the "Big Brother" version. There, no one can eat you without your permission, neither from behind, nor from the front, nor from the side.

 4. Debts force you to sell your soul, your political family, but also the most beautiful flag in the world.

Dear friend Edi, we are 113 years old and we can't find out who knitted it and who has the original version of the Declaration of Independence flag.

It could not be found even when the statues immortalizing the Declaration of Independence were exhumed/taken down in Flag Square.

Don't be ruthless with your "faithful dog."

Taulant has served you as a "blindly loyal dog", always and whenever he had to attack anyone who opposed or disliked you.

Lack of spirituality is a characteristic of authoritarian to dictatorial leaders.

You swear 24/7 that you're not like that.

Try it publicly with the case of comrade Taulant, who never tires of offering himself as a "loyal dog" to every successive leader, but without abandoning the old ones.

Taulant studied political science in Anastasios' Romania, and there he learned about the usefulness of being a "loyal dog" for accelerated progress and unlimited power.

The more times he bit in the service of the all-powerful leader, the faster and higher his career soared.

Taulant is not an individual, but the prototype and leader of a pack of loyal dogs abused for not only political gains.

The problem is that quite a few of the pack of loyal dogs have died politically. The turn is approaching for Taulant too.

I have just landed in Rome, the homeland of a United Europe. As a student of European integration, only arrogant and greedy leaders from any political party can delay, but cannot hinder, the European perspective of the Albanian nation.

To prove the social utility of posts, I asked artificial intelligence for help with what "Who is Loyal" means in politics. Here's its answer.

"From a negative perspective, the concept of "loyal dog" can imply several unfavorable aspects:

 * Blind and uncritical loyalty: Can suggest someone who blindly follows instructions or supports a person or idea without questioning whether it is right or wrong. This can lead to a lack of critical thinking and harmful or immoral actions.

 * Overdependence and lack of individuality: It can portray someone who is overly dependent on another, losing their identity and ability to act independently.

This can mean a lack of initiative and self-confidence.

 * Exploitation and abuse: A person who is "loyal as a dog" may be more prone to being exploited or abused by others, as their unwavering loyalty can be exploited for nefarious purposes.

 * Lack of ambition and initiative: It may suggest someone who is content to follow others and has no ambition to take the lead or pursue their own goals.

 * In political or social contexts: It can be used pejoratively to label someone as a blind follower of a leader or ideology, ignoring any contrary arguments or evidence.

Essentially, in a negative sense, the phrase "loyal dog" devalues ​​independent thought, personal initiative, and the ability to question authority or existing norms. It suggests a blind loyalty that can be harmful to the individual and to society as a whole.”