"Don't play these games with me"/ Meta's lawyer debates with journalist, Are you defending SPAK or politics?

The lawyer of PL president Ilir Meta, Kujtim Cakrani, was involved in a debate with TCH journalist Anila Hoxha after Meta was officially named a defendant by SPAK.

Cakrani said on "Top Story" that a large 30-year-old mud fortress has been built against Meta and that public opinion wants to hear about corrupt politicians.

Also, the mention of an American citizen in the file of Ilir Meta, who was taken as a defendant today in SPAK, became a matter of debate between journalist Anila Hoxha and lawyer Cakrani. According to the lawyer, evidence against Ilir Meta has been fabricated and there are no facts against him.

Meanwhile, journalist Anila Hoxha addressed him, telling him that he is not Altin Dumani and Arben Kraja and that the lawyer should defend him in court.

Excerpts from the studio debate:

Cakrani: A large 30-year-old mud fortress has been built against Meta. Public opinion wants to hear about corrupt politicians. How will the political opponent be hit if he does not produce evidence? Mr. Meta has known Kastriot Ismail since childhood. Meta's corruption with CEZ-DiA is unrelated. When that contract was signed, Meta was not even the Minister of Economy. A Rebeka is mentioned. When a former prime minister was taken under investigation, a former prime minister was mentioned, but Meta was not mentioned. Therefore, Mr. Meta has no criminal record. There is not a single document in his role as a former prime minister.

Duma: Is Mrs. Rebeka mentioned?

Hoxha: No, maybe…

Cakrani: Have you read the file?

Hoxha: You are not facing a prosecutor.

Cakrani: Find me proof that Ismailaj did a favor for Meta. No, that's not how it's said.

Hoxha: I am not Altin Dumani and Arben Kraja. Do your defense in court. Did I say anything that IliR Meta is guilty? Did I say anything on behalf of SPAK? I hold my position as a lawyer without accusing others. Let's maintain ethics. Speak as a lawyer with facts. Don't do these political and lawyerly things with me because I am speaking balancedly. I do not accept this lawyerly language.

Cakrani: Are you defending SPAK or politics? I have come to speak to the public about what happened to the former president. A great deal of mud has been deliberately thrown at the president by politics.

Hoxha: Who is the politician in this studio?

Cakrani: The public is judging me here

Hoxha: The lawyer is right. Who won the case?

Cakrani: I know you've read the file very well.